As one of the leading Colorado personal injury law firms we have won many large verdicts for our clients. We are proud of the work that we do on behalf of the rights of injured people. At Anderson Hemmat, our personal injury attorneys make our clients our number one priority and our results speak for themselves.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident - Male, 23 yrs old | Judgement: $1,450,000.00

Description: The client was riding his motorcycle home when a drunk driver ran a stop sign and pulled in front of the client, causing him to be thrown head first through the back door and window of the drunk's car. The drunk driver had a BAC nearly twice the DUI limit when she caused the collision. The client spent nearly a month in the hospital where he underwent liver surgery, a spleen removal, and had screws surgically implanted in his arm and leg.


Case Type: Workers’ Compensation - Female, 28 yrs old | Settlement: $750,000.00

Description: A nurse, while on duty, was tending to a patient. The nurse had to lift the patient in order to do her job. While lifting the patient out of bed, the patient fell back onto the nurse which resulted in the nurse having to undergo multiple back surgeries.


Case Type: Construction Accident - Male, 32 yrs old | Settlement: $500,000.00

Description: While on a construction job, a worker fell from scaffolding onto hard cement. The scaffolding was not secured properly which caused the male worker to fall. The worker severed his spinal cord which resulted in paraplegia.


Case Type: Automobile Accident - Male, 56 yrs old | Settlement: $500,000.00

Description: A man was a passenger in a co-workers' vehicle when the driver lost control of the vehicle. The vehicle rolled over which resulted in the man having to undergo a bladder and back surgery.


Case Type: Legal Malpractice/Insurance Bad Faith - Female, yrs old | Settlement: $415,000.00

Description: Two law firms that were assisting a mentally disabled woman settled an insurance bad faith claim for $250,000.00. The insurance policy provided, however, that the disabled person could be entitled to as much as $500,000.00 but the woman and her family were not advised of that possibility. When the family complained about the settlement, the attorneys representing the woman at the time stated that if she did not agree to take the settlement, the settlement would be enforced by the Court and she would lose. After she took the settlement, a legal malpractice action was brought by Mr. Hemmat against the disabled woman’s former lawyers for negligent representation.


Case Type: Car Accident - Male, 32 yrs old | Settlement: $325,000.00

Description: A man was rear-ended by a commercial vehicle and suffered a herniated disk in his lower back. This injury led to fusion surgery


Case Type: Automobile Accident - Male, 44 yrs old | Verdict: $256,000.00

Description: A man was rear-ended by an elderly defendant resulting in only $593.00 worth of damage to the man’s car. As a result of the automobile collision, the man underwent a neck surgery and suffered some damage to his vision.


Case Type: Automobile Accident - Male, 36 yrs old | Settlement: $210,000.00

Description: A man was a passenger in a vehicle that was traveling down the highway. The driver fell asleep causing a one-vehicle rollover collision. The man ultimately required a neck surgery.


Case Type: Legal Malpractice/Medical Malpractice - Female, 36 yrs old | Settlement: $800,000.00

Description: A woman went in for testing because of migraine headaches. MRI scans showed nothing abnormal. She went back in for more testing three years later because the headaches got worse. They then found a large meningioma tumor on the new scan. After reviewing the prior MRI scans this tumor should have been found on the first scan three years prior. If found earlier the tumor could have been treated with focused radiation but because the tumor was allowed to grow she underwent three open brain surgeries. The woman started a medical malpractice claim. The firm she hired dropped the case and did not properly notify the client. The clients statue of limitations was allowed to expire. Client finally hire us to prove both attorney negligence and the underlying medical malpractice case. Full story can be found here.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident - Male, 61 yrs old | Judgement: $1,450,000.00

Description: A man riding home on a motorcycle was struck by a negligent driver who wrongfully took the right of way at an intersection. The client suffered serious injuries to his neck, head, and leg and was kept at the hospital for four months before he could finally return home.


Case Type: Insurance Bad Faith - Male, 49 yrs old | Judgement: $2,500,000.00

Description: A man was rear-ended by a driver and complained of back pain to his doctor 16 days after the collision. The client underwent three back surgeries and incurred $400,000 in medical bills. The driver who rear-ended the client had inadequate insurance coverage to compensate the client for his injuries so the client made a claim on his underinsured motorist policy. The insurance company unreasonably denied and delayed the client’s claim and refused to fairly compensate him for his injuries.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident - Male, 53 yrs old | Judgement: $445,000.00

Description: While visiting a friend in Denver, a man was rear-ended by a drunk driver who had consumed 19 to 21 Corona Beers—some of which were consumed in the car on the way to the bar. The client sustained injuries to his shoulder in the collision and later underwent surgery to repair a left rotator cuff tear.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident - Male, 57 yrs old | Judgement: $997,600.00

Description: A local union carpenter was rear-ended by another driver on a snowy day. When he was standing between the two vehicles to inspect the damage, a third vehicle rear-ended the stopped cars, pinning the carpenter’s left leg between his bumper and the bumper of the first contact vehicle. The carpenter’s leg was crushed and he underwent a series of surgeries over the next 17 days. His injuries caused him devastating loss of income.


Case Type: Wrongful Death/Motor Vehicle Accident - Female, 50 yrs old | Judgement: $10,000,000.00

Description: A single mother of one was acting as a designated driver driving home family members after a wedding. She was proceeding, after dropping off her last family member, westbound on 92nd Avenue approaching Federal Blvd. At that same time, a 25 year old male with blood alcohol level in excess of .36 BAC, was proceeding eastbound on the westbound lane of 92nd at an excessive speed. At the intersection of 92nd and Bryant the intoxicated 25 year old male struck head on the vehicle driven by the 50 year old victim. The victim died at the scene survived by her young daughter.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident/Workers' Compensation - Male, 33 yrs old | Settlement: $2,600,000.00

Description: Mechanic driving from Denver to Glenwood Springs delivering a repaired vehicle, rolled the vehicle he was in and he was thrown from the vehicle which resulted in suffering partial paralysis. The driver was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident.


Case Type: Motor Vehicle Accident - Male, 49 yrs old | Settlement: $1,295,000.00

Description: Nurse rear-ended by a driver, in a chain reaction 4 vehicle collision with approximately $3,700.00 worth of property damage. The client thought he had sustained no physical injury at the time of the accident. Approximately 12 days later, the client began treating for low back injury. Ultimately, the client underwent a 4 level back fusion and was forced to quit his job as a nurse.


Case Type: Workers' Compensation - Male, 37 yrs old | Settlement: $1,200,000.00

Description: A traveling businessman was struck by his supervisor in a bar during work hours. The employee fell to the ground striking his head and suffered brain injury.


Case Type: Legal Malpractice/Medical Malpractice - Female, 36 yrs. old | Settlement: $800,000.00

Description: A woman went in for testing because of migraine headaches. MRI scans showed nothing abnormal. She went back in for more testing three years later because the headaches got worse. They then found a large meningioma tumor on the new scan. After reviewing the prior MRI scans this tumor should have been found on the first scan three years prior. If found earlier the tumor could have been treated with focused radiation but because the tumor was allowed to grow she underwent three open brain surgeries. The woman started a medical malpractice claim. The firm she hired dropped the case and did not properly notify the client. The clients statue of limitations was allowed to expire. Client finally hire us to prove both attorney negligence and the underlying medical malpractice case. Full story can be found here.


Disclaimer: Past success does not guarantee future results.

Speak With an Experienced Injury Attorney Today!

Use the form below and a representative will respond shortly. Thank you for visiting www.andersonhemmat.com!


Preferred Contact Method:

Are You a Robot? - Help

Memberships, Awards and Accolades:

Associations

  • Peer Review Ratings - Martindale.com
  • Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • Lawyers.com Rating
  • MULTI MILLION DOLLAR ADVOCATES FORUM
  • AVVO Rating
  • Super Lawyers

Anderson Hemmat Personal Injury Case FAQ's

Let us help you answer the tough questions you may have about your case. If you don't find what you're looking for you can ask your question here any time.


  • When does a personal injury case go to court?

    Typically, a personal injury accident case will go to trial when a settlement agreement cannot be reached outside of courts. If the defendant in the personal injury case is refusing to offer a settlement that accurately reflects the extent of damages, then a trial might be the only option to secure maximum financial compensation.

  • How do I know if I should accept a settlement offer?

    The best way to know whether or not you should accept a personal injury settlement is to consult with an accident lawyer you trust. Insurance companies try to get claimants to settle quickly before they know how much they actually could get for their accident. Consider having your personal injury case evaluated by a Denver accident attorney from our law firm.

  • How much does it cost to hire a lawyer from your law firm?

    Anderson Hemmat operates on a contingency fee basis. This is a "no recovery, no fee" guarantee which basically states that you do not owe us attorney fees until we obtain a verdict or settlement for you. To learn more about payment options, please call our experienced accident attorneys directly.

  • Do I need an accident lawyer to handle my personal injury case?

    While it is not mandatory that you have legal representation for a personal injury case, it can be extremely beneficial. Many people are cut short of the financial compensation because they were not aware of how much they actually deserved for their extensive accident.

  • I don't think my accident was very serious. Should I still go to the hospital?

    Many people do not go to the hospital after car accidents either because they think they are not injured or they fear they will have to pay out of pocket for the visit. Truthfully, many car accident injuries can go undetected and may not begin to bother the victim until days or even weeks after the accident. As a precaution, anyone involved in a moderate to serious car accident should go to the hospital for a physical evaluation. Most likely, this visit will be covered by insurance. Just be sure to keep record of the visit and the payment for the visit.

  • How do I know if I'm being offered a fair settlement for my auto accident?

    It can be difficult for a driver to know how much they're entitled to after a car accident. Many drivers accept the insurance company's first settlement offer because they trust that it's fair and will be enough to cover all accident-related expenses. This is not always the case. We encourage drivers to consult with a car accident attorney after a collision for a second opinion on how much your claim is worth. More often than not, insurance companies offer claimants far less than they actually deserve.

  • How is the value of my claim calculated?

    Colorado has comparative/contributory negligence laws. This means that even drivers who are partially at fault for accidents can recover compensation from insurance. However, this does not apply to drivers who are more than 50 percent at fault for the collision. For example, if the insurance adjusters decided that you were 20 percent at-fault and the other driver was 80 percent at-fault, then you could collect up to 80 percent from the other driver's insurance.

  • View All Personal Injury Case FAQ's

INJURY LAW UPDATES

Captcha Image
Anderson Hemmat, LLC
5613 DTC Pkwy #150 Greenwood Village , CO 80111
Phone: (303) 782-9999

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information on this website is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © Anderson Hemmat, LLC | By +Chad Hemmat | Colorado Injury Accident Attorneys | Personal Injury Blog | About Anderson Hemmat Law Firm | Privacy

Anderson Hemmat Logo

Secure Client Area Login




Lost your password? Click here to reset it...

Anderson Hemmat Logo

Reset Your Password